Legal Opinion
Darby v. Shinseki
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 24, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2014-1032PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge
Denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Relief from Final Judgment
Plaintiff, Ms. Barbara Darby, filed a pro se complaint that this Court dismissed for insufficient service of process. Several years later, Ms. Darby moved for reconsideration, which this Court construes as a motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60. The Court denies the motion because Ms. Darby does not substantively explain why the Court should reconsider its prior opinion, the motion was not filed within a reasonable time, and no extraordinary…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- McNeil v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Klapprott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Smith-Haynie, J. C. v. Davis, AddisonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers Union, Local No. 59 v. Superline Transportation Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Thec International-Hamdard Cordova Group-Nazari Constr. Co. v. Cohen Mohr, LLPCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Doe v. Kipp Dc Supporting CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
- Houston Municipal Employees Pension System v. BofI Holding, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2021
- In the Matter of the Federal Bureau of Prisons' Execution Protocol CasesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Smith v. United States District CourtDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.