Legal Opinion
E. Heller & Bros. v. R. W. Eldridge & Co.
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided December 8, 1922PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWatson, C. J.
The plaintiff is a New York corporation, having its principal place of business at 892 Broadway in the city of New York, and engaged in the business of manufacturing, buying and selling handkerchiefs and cloth used for their manufacture. The defendant is a domestic corporation, engaged in *248the business of manufacturing, buying and selling handkerchiefs at Orleans, this State. A. C. Lordly is a cotton goods broker doing business at 320 Broadway, New York City, and as such broker acted in behalf of both plaintiff and defendant in connection with the transactions to which reference is hereinafter…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Nassoiy v. . TomlinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Cox v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- McDaniels v. President of the Bank of RutlandSupreme Court of Vermont · 1857
- Bellows v. SowlesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1883
- Connecticut River Lumber Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Vermont · 1895
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Alexander v. ChevalierSupreme Court of Vermont · 1924
- Crosby's Admrs. v. NaatzSupreme Court of Vermont · 1924
- Dow v. A. C. Cheney Piano Action Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1932