Legal Opinion

Washington Legal Foundation v. Friedman

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 16, 1999No. Civ.A. 94-1306 (RCL)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

LAMBERTH, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on defendants’ motion to alter or amend the judgment and for a stay. Upon consideration of the motion, plaintiffs opposition thereto, defendants’ reply, and the entire record in this ease, the defendants’ motion will be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, and the parties will be directed to submit supplemental briefs as specified by the Court.

I. FACTS

On July 30,1998, this Court granted plaintiff Washington Legal Foundation’s (WLF) motion for summary judgment against the federal defendants Friedman and Shalala,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Washington Legal Foundation v. FriedmanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Washington Legal Foundation v. HenneyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
  2. Smith & Nephew, Inc. v. Synthes (U.S.A.)District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2006
  3. United States v. CaroniaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2008
  4. Amarin Pharma, Inc. v. United States Food & Drug AdministrationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  5. Washington Legal Foundation v. HenneyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API