Legal Opinion
Tepler v. Frick
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 1, 1953No. 22611PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
204 F.2d 506
TEPLER,
v.
FRICK et al.
No. 208, Docket 22611.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued April 8, 1953.
Decided May 1, 1953.
Frederic A. Johnson, William M. Kunstler and Michael J. Kunstler, New York City, for appellant.
Willkie, Owen, Farr, Gallagher & Walton, New York City, Sidley, Austin, Burgess & Smith, Chicago, Ill., and Baker, Hostetler & Patterson, Cleveland, Ohio, for Ford C. Frick, Chicago National League Ball Club and Cleveland Baseball Co., appellees.
Shearman & Sterling & Wright, New York City, Willard M. L. Robinson, New York City, and Winston, Strawn, Black &…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Tepler v. FrickDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
- Tepler v. FrickCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
3Cited by5 opinions
- Molinas v. National Basketball AssociationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- Salerno v. American League of Professional Baseball ClubsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Robinson v. LullDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1956
- Karlinsky v. New York Racing Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971
- Raubal v. Engelhard Minerals & Chemicals CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973