Legal Opinion

Sanders v. Flenniken

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 11, 1929PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, C. J.,

(after stating the facts). Appellants brought this suit in equity, and asked that certain conveyances by appellees be canceled as clouds upon their title. Such a suit is of purely equitable cognizance, although appellants ask that the title to the land be also declared in themselves, and that they have possession under their claim of title.

Appellees pleaded in bar of the recovery of the land by appellants that they were guilty of laches. The doctrine of laches is entirely a defense in equity, and, if the facts justified it, constituted a bar to the right of appellants to the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Johnston v. Standard Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Patterson v. HewittSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. Taylor v. Salt Creek Consol. Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922
  5. Walker-Lucas-Hudson Oil Company v. HudsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Hendrix v. HendrixSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  2. Anadarko Petroleum Co. v. VenableSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  3. John W. Tlapek v. Chevron Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
  4. Patterson v. McKaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  5. Schuman v. WalthourSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API