Legal Opinion

Anadarko Petroleum Co. v. Venable

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 22, 1993No. 92-1009PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Justice.

This is an appeal involving a question in the law of oil and gas which arises out of the interpretation given three deeds executed and recorded in 1939 and the interest conveyed by the deeds. The grantors in the three separate deeds were, respectively, the Royalls, the Pattons, and the Wigginses. Each deed contained, in effect, two granting clauses of mineral interests. The first clause contained an outright grant, and the second granted an amount dependent upon the amount granted in a certain lease. An issue before the Chancellor, and before us now on appeal, was…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Patterson v. HewittSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. J.W. Reynolds Lumber Co. v. Smackover State BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  3. Christmas v. RaleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  4. Continental Insurance Companies v. StanleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  5. Padgett v. HastonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Cochran v. BentleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  2. Goforth v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  3. Carwell Elevator Co., Inc. v. LeathersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  4. Massongill v. County of ScottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  5. Self v. SelfSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API