Legal Opinion

Richards v. City of Geneva

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1936PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCunningham, J.

The plaintiff was employed by defendant as patrolman between the 29th day of May, 1927, and the 15th day of March, 1935. On the latter date the plaintiff “ left the employ of defendant.” The complaint alleges that “ the defendant during each and every year of plaintiff’s said employment retained from plaintiff’s salary sums of money which said sums of money were retained by defendant as part of what is known as the police pension fund.”

In 1927 the defendant adopted a local law amending an. act formerly passed by the Legislature establishing the police pension fund of the city of Geneva. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pennie v. ReisSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. State ex rel. Risch v. Board of Trustees of the Policemen's Pension FundWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Clarke v. ReisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. People, Ex Rel. Freligh v. . MatsellNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  5. Greiner v. City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sandell v. Saint Paul Police Relief Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  2. Williams v. City of KnoxvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Genthner v. ValentineCity of New York Municipal Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API