Legal Opinion

Turk & Campbell Plumbing Co. v. Vaselo

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 30, 1953No. 7963PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McINNIS,- Judge.

This is a demand by opponent that it be placed on the account of the executrix for $271.10 claimed to be due for plumbing-work performed for deceased during his. lifetime.

An exception of no cause or right of action to the opposition was filed and overruled, and the executrix filed an answer denying the correctness of the account and alleging that the only bill she has from opponent is an undated statement for $131.-27, with a pencil notation, also undated, “Paid by check $50.00”, reducing the sum due to $81.27.

After trial of the opposition on the merits the district judge…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Succession of DugasSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
  2. Rochelle v. RussLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. Succession of CoreilSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
  4. Taylor v. Succession of SweetmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
  5. Longino v. LonginoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1936

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Succession of GrubbsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. Guzman v. RollingLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API