Legal Opinion
Archuleta v. City of Roswell
District Court, D. New Mexico
Decided September 30, 2012No. CIV 10-1224 JB/RHSPublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JAMES 0. BROWNING, District Judge.
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant Santiago Hernandez’s Motion to Dismiss, Defense of Failure to State a Claim, under Rule 12(b)(6), filed February 23, 2012 (Doc. 18)(“Motion to Dismiss”). Plaintiff Francisco S. Archuleta is currently incarcerated at a federal facility in Florence, Colorado, and is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. The primary issues are: (i) whether Defendant David Hernandez, Archuleta’s attorney in a federal criminal case, is a private citizen or a state actor as required for a cause of action…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Anderson Living Trust v. Conocophillips Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2013
- Tapia v. City of AlbuquerqueDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
- Abraham v. WPX Production Productions, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2016
- Tapia v. City of AlbuquerqueDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
- A.M. ex rel. Youngers v. New Mexico Department of HealthDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.