Legal Opinion

State v. Curtis

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 15, 2005No. 30495-3-IIPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 The trial court gave Michael Curtis an exceptional sentence after he pleaded guilty to two counts of second degree child molestation. After a commissioner of this court affirmed Curtis’s sentence, the United States Supreme Court decided Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S. Ct. 2531, 159 L. Ed. 2d 403, reh’g denied, 542 U.S. 961 (2004); Curtis moved for reconsideration. The State argues that Curtis admitted the facts supporting his *461sentence during allocution and that even if he did not, the error was harmless. We hold that Curtis’s statements during allocution were not admissions and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. State v. LordWashington Supreme Court · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. IsaacksSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  2. State v. DettmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  3. State v. WardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  4. State v. KingNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. State v. EllisonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API