Legal Opinion

Barkley v. Boardman

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1928No. File No. 6371PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORIARTY, C.

The respondent, Fuella A. Barkley, began this action to recover from 'George Boardman, as sheriff of 'Minnehaha county, $2,143.28 which he was holding under an execution levy.

The evidence was taken before a jury, but, when both parties had rested, each party moved for the direction of a verdict, and the trial court announced that he considered that there was no question of fact to be submitted to the jury, and that he would make findings of fact and conclusions of law.

Thereafter the court made its findings and conclusions in favor of the plaintiff’s contentions and entered…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Union National Bank v. OiumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Minneapolis Threshing Machine Co. v. CalhounSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Durand v. PrestonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Sherman v. HarrisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Godfrey v. FaustSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Wessington Springs v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Murdo Independent School Dist. v. LitzenbergSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Raney v. RiedySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API