Legal Opinion

State v. Benge

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1996No. 95-112PublishedCited by 110 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.

Benge presents twenty propositions of law for our review. Although we decline to address each one in writing, we have fully considered Benge’s propositions of law, independently weighed the statutory aggravating circumstances against the mitigating factors, and reviewed the proportionality of the sentence to other similar cases. See State v. Poindexter (1988), 36 Ohio St.3d 1, 520 N.E.2d 568, syllabus; State v. Simko (1994), 71 Ohio St.3d 483, 487, 644 N.E.2d 345, 350. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the convictions and the death penalty sentence.

I

Voluntary…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. State v. LongOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. MillsOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. MaurerOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. CarterOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. LandrumOhio Supreme Court · 1990

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by110 opinions

  1. State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. TreeshOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. MurphyOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. GoffOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. TibbettsOhio Supreme Court · 2001

105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API