Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Maheu v. Eighth Judicial District Court Ex Rel. County of Clark, Dept. No. 6

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1972No. 6663Published

1ConcurrenceZenoff, C. J.

I concur with the result reached by the majority that the extraordinary writs must issue, but in particular, base my concurrence that mandamus lies to compel the discovery right to depose Howard R. Hughes on the following rationale.

*36I. On January 11, 1971 Judge Babcock stayed the taking of the deposition of Hughes Tool Company noticed for January 11, 1971 until further order of the court. The motion on which the stay was predicated set forth the grounds, in addition to testimony and evidence theretofore received, to be:

“ 1. The discovery sought is premature.
“2. The discovery sought is not in…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Powell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. HughesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  4. Hays v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Paul Martin and Verla Martin v. Reynolds Metals CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API