Legal Opinion

State v. Ambill

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 14, 2016No. 12CR0830; A154252PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLagesen, J.

Defendant was convicted of murder. In accordance with ORS 163.115(5)(a) and (b),1 the trial court sentenced him to an indeterminate life sentence with a 25-year minimum term of confinement without eligibility for parole. Defendant appeals, and the state cross-appeals. Defendant seeks reversal of his conviction, contending that the trial court committed two evidentiary errors. The state seeks a remand to the trial court for resentencing, contending that the trial court erred when it concluded that it lacked authority to impose a minimum term of confinement in excess of the 25 years specified…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Hamel v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. MorganOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Young v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. State Ex Rel. Engweiler v. CookOregon Supreme Court · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. NoblesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  2. Guzman v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026
  3. State v. HubbardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  4. Guzman v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API