Legal Opinion
Singh v. Daimler
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided October 10, 2012No. Case No. 12-11963PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT AND GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION
SEAN F. COX, District Judge.
In this action, Plaintiff asserts Title VII employment discrimination and retaliation claims, breach of contract and promissory estoppel claims, and a claim under South Carolina’s Wage Payment Act, against three different corporate entities. This matter is currently before the Court on: 1) an Amended Motion to Dismiss and/or for Summary Judgment filed by two of the three Defendants; and 2) Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Amend…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Herman Theunissen and Ann Theunissen v. Sid Matthews D/B/A Matthews Lumber TransferCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Conn v. ZakharovCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Estate of Thomson Ex Rel. Estate of Rakestraw v. Toyota Motor Corp. WorldwideCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Daimler-Benz Aktiengesellschaft v. Olson, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Arnold v. CooperSurgical, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2023
- Camelo v. Pluese, Becker & Saltzman LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024
- Manufacturing Repair & Overstock, Inc. v. KasingerDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2025