Legal Opinion
Camelo v. Pluese, Becker & Saltzman LLC
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided September 26, 2024No. 2:23-cv-12598Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION THERESA CAMELO, Plaintiff, Case No. 23-cv-12598 v. Hon. Matthew F. Leitman PLUESE, BECKER & SALTZMAN LLC, et al., Defendants. __________________________________________________________________/ ORDER (1) OVERRULING IN PART AND TERMINATING AS MOOT IN PART PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS (ECF No. 38) TO REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF No. 36); (2) ADOPTING IN PART AND TERMINATING AS MOOT IN PART RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF No. 36); (3) GRANTING DEFENDANT PLUESE, BECKER & SALTZMAN LLC’S MOTION TO…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Southern MacHine Company, Inc. v. Mohasco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.