Dondero v. O'Hara
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tuolumne County, and from an order denying a new trial. R. C. Rust, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
Ejectment. Plaintiffs had judgment from which and from the order denying their motion for a new trial, defendants appeal. The cause was tried by the Honorable R. C. Rust, judge of the superior court of Amador county, presiding at the trial by request of the judge of the superior court of Tuolumne county. We find printed in the brief of counsel for respondent the following opinion, filed in the case by the presiding judge, which seems to ns to clearly present the grounds upon which the decision rests, and satisfactorily meets the principal points now made by appellants: namely, that the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Frink v. RoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Gregg v. BostwickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Hicks v. LovellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Zilmer v. GerichtenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- De Arguello v. BoursCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Peck v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Wade v. HoweCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934