Legal Opinion

Munck v. Kansas Public Employees Retirement System

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided March 10, 2006No. 94,800PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rulon, C.J.:

Claimant William F. Munclc appeals the termination of his Kansas Public Employees Retirement System (KPERS) disability benefits, contending the administrative hearing officer and the district court misconstrued applicable statutory provisions and erroneously applied workers compensation case law to resolve his disability claim. The claimant further alleges respondent KPERS unconstitutionally suspended the claimant’s disability benefits without a timely hearing and illegally contracted for a provision to deprive benefit recipients of due process.

As this is the second time this case…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Gilbert v. HomarSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MallenSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lyons Ex Rel. Lawing v. HolderCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2007
  2. In re the Conservatorship of ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2006
  3. Case & Assocs. Props. Inc. v. BribiescaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API