Legal Opinion
Broyles v. State Personnel Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 3, 1941No. Civ. 12754PublishedCited by 10 opinions
Kimpton Ellis'for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.
Petitioners commenced this action to compel the State Personnel Board, the Unemployment Reserves Commission and various state officers to reinstate them in their positions in the state service and to pay them salaries claimed to be due. They have appealed from a judgment denying their petition.
After taking a civil service examination petitioners were on October 1, 1937, appointed to the positions of senior interviewer, division of employment agencies, department of employment of the Unemployment Reserves Commission of the State of California at a salary of $160 per month. The trial court…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Neuwald v. BrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Stephenson v. Unemployment Reserves CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
3Cited by10 opinions
- Martin v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Randolph v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- City of Tacoma v. Civil Service BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
- Santillano v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Boutwell v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.