Legal Opinion
Santillano v. State Personnel Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 12, 1981No. Civ. 48763PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT. *
Linda Santillano was discharged from employment as a psychiatric technician at Napa State Hospital, ostensibly by “rejection during probationary period” (Gov. Code, § 19173). Respondent State Personnel Board (the Board) affirmed the dismissal; Santillano’s petition for a writ of mandate (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5) was denied by the trial court. Santillano appeals to this court, contending that she had attained permanent status before she was discharged and therefore that the hospital’s purported “notice of rejection during probationary period” was invalid and she is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Whitcomb Hotel, Inc. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Kugler v. YocumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Mudd v. McColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Killian v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Wiles v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Braun v. Bureau of State AuditsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Bell v. City of TorranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Birdsall v. CarrilloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- California School Employees Ass'n v. Compton Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.