Legal Opinion
Consul v. Burke
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 3, 1991No. 448 Philadelphia 1990PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POPOVICH, Judge:
This case involves an appeal from the December 27,1989, order granting the preliminary objections of the additional defendants (Arthur D. Hodess, M.D., and M. Price Margo-lies Associates) to their joinder in a malpractice suit by the original defendants/appellants (Bernard Burke, M.D., and Isaac Tam, M.D.).1 We affirm.
The procedural history of this case begins with the filing of a six-count complaint on February 29,1988, by Ronald A. Consul and Beth Ann Consul, his wife, against Drs. Burke and Tam (on grounds of medical malpractice) and Rugby, *402Inc., Chelsea Laboratories, Inc.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chiricos v. Forest Lakes Council Boy Scouts of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Moore v. Howard P. Foley Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Kovalesky v. Esther Williams Swimming PoolsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Vorhauer v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Riccobono v. Keystone Helicopter Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pittsburgh Coal & Coke, Inc. v. CuteriSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Francisco v. Ford Motor Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Consul v. BurkeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Pittsburgh Coal & Coke, Inc. v. CuteriSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Valentine v. Mickiewicz, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Adams County1998