Legal Opinion

Consul v. Burke

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 3, 1991No. 448 Philadelphia 1990Published

1Opinion of the Court

403 Pa. Superior Ct. 400 (1991)

589 A.2d 246

Ronald A. CONSUL and Beth Ann Consul, H/W

v.

Bernard BURKE, M.D., Isaac Tam, M.D., Rugby Laboratories, Inc., Chelsea Laboratories and Marshall Pharmacal Corporation

v.

Arthur D. HODESS, M.D. and M. Price Margolies Associates, Additional Defendants.

Appeal of Bernard BURKE, M.D. and Isaac Tam, M.D.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued October 16, 1990.

Filed April 3, 1991.

Thomas O. Malcolm, West Chester, for appellants.

Jerome Ornsteen, Bala Cynwyd, for Hodess & Margolies Associates, appellees.

Before DEL SOLE, POPOVICH and BROSKY, JJ.

POPOVICH, Judge:

This…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Zakian v. LILJESTRANDSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Martinelli v. MulloySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Chiricos v. Forest Lakes Council Boy Scouts of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Moore v. Howard P. Foley Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Kovalesky v. Esther Williams Swimming PoolsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API