Legal Opinion
Durrance v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 22, 2013No. A12A1898PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Presiding Judge.
Following a jury trial, Jason Durrance was convicted of driving with an alcohol concentration exceeding 0.08 grams (“DUI per se” OCGA § 40-6-391 (a) (5)).1 Durrance filed a motion for new trial, which the trial court denied. On appeal, Durrance contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the results of the breath test and the field sobriety examination. Durrance also contends that the trial court erred in allowing the State to cross-examine him and present evidence showing the severity of an argument he had with his wife prior to the DUI…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Cann-Hanson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- State v. NashSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
- Frederick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. CriswellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- State v. GauthierCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- Wright v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
- Collins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- WILKERSON v. the STATE.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.