Legal Opinion

Roy Adamsen v. Asbury Transportation Company, a Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 20, 1962No. 17604PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JERTBERG, Circuit Judge.

Appellant (plaintiff below) a citizen of the State of Oregon, instituted suit in the district court against appellee (defendant below), a California corporation, to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained in a railroad crossing collision when a passenger train on which he was a passenger collided with appellee’s tank truck and tank trailer which was crossing the railroad tracks. Jurisdiction of the district court was properly invoked under Title 28 U. S.C. § 1332.

Following trial to a jury, a general verdict was returned in favor of appellee…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Robison v. Oregon-Wash. R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Fish v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Cathcart v. Oregon-Washington R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Doty v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Angelo Moret, A/K/A Harry, and Augustine MoretCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  2. United States v. Angelo Moret, A/K/A Harry, and Augustine MoretCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API