United States v. Angelo Moret, A/K/A Harry, and Augustine Moret

(concurring) .

While I join in the affirmance of both-convictions, my reasons for so doing in-Augustine’s case differ markedly from-, those advanced in the opinion of Judge-Dimock. Simply stated, I believe that, the jury might properly have concluded: that the “package” which Augustine-. *891was seen to pass to Angelo outside of ■the building was identical to the “envelope” of narcotics which Angelo sold inside, and I would, therefore, affirm Augustine’s conviction. In light of the •evidence, the instructions of the Court, ■and the arguments of counsel, however, I do not believe that the jury…