Voting Integrity Project, Inc. Fred Decker Alberta Bryant Diana Evans Charles Sauvie v. Phil Keisling, Secretary of State Opinion of Oregon
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KLEINFELD, Circuit Judge.
The issue in this case is whether state legislation allowing people to vote by mail over an extended period violates a federal statute requiring that the election shall be held on a particular day.
Voting Integrity Project, Inc. and several individuals brought a federal civil rights suit for declaratory and injunctive relief, 2 to establish that an Oregon statute that allows Oregonians to vote by mail for a substantial period prior to or as well as on this federal election day violates the federal election laws. This case concerns only legal issues, and no facts are in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Margolis v. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Foster v. LoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Voting Integrity Project, Inc. v. BomerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- DeFlesco v. Mercer County Board of ElectionsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
3Cited by12 opinions
- Phyllis Griffin v. Elaine RoupasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Millsaps v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Lamone v. CapozziCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Republican Natl Cmte v. WetzelCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024
- DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT, INC. v. MURPHYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.