Legal Opinion

Voting Integrity Project, Inc. Fred Decker Alberta Bryant Diana Evans Charles Sauvie v. Phil Keisling, Secretary of State Opinion of Oregon

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 11, 2001No. 99-35337PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KLEINFELD, Circuit Judge.

The issue in this case is whether state legislation allowing people to vote by mail over an extended period violates a federal statute requiring that the election shall be held on a particular day.

Voting Integrity Project, Inc. and several individuals brought a federal civil rights suit for declaratory and injunctive relief, 2 to establish that an Oregon statute that allows Oregonians to vote by mail for a substantial period prior to or as well as on this federal election day violates the federal election laws. This case concerns only legal issues, and no facts are in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Margolis v. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  3. Foster v. LoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Voting Integrity Project, Inc. v. BomerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  5. DeFlesco v. Mercer County Board of ElectionsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Phyllis Griffin v. Elaine RoupasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  2. Millsaps v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  3. Lamone v. CapozziCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  4. Republican Natl Cmte v. WetzelCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024
  5. DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT, INC. v. MURPHYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API