Legal Opinion

Simmons v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 18, 2013No. 29PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreene, J.

“In criminal prosecutions, the polygraph test is a pariah; ‘polygraph’ is a dirty word.” State v. Hawkins, 326 Md. 270, 275, 604 A.2d 489, 492 (1992). In this case, we consider whether defense counsel’s reference, during opening statement, to his client’s willingness to take a lie detector test creates manifest necessity for a mistrial, where the trial judge gave a curative instruction to the jury immediately following the improper reference and the prosecutor did not request a mistrial for reason of that improper remark until two days further into the trial. We shall affirm the judgment of…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  5. Wade v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. HartCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
  2. Winston, Mayhew & Cannon v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  3. Jackson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2016
  4. Vaise v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  5. Walls v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2016

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API