Legal Opinion

Givens v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 22, 2016No. 88/15PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWatts, J.

Factually and legally inconsistent verdicts have vexed litigants and been the subject of Maryland appellate opinions in both civil cases and criminal cases for decades. One such case of significant impact is Price v. State, 405 Md. 10, 29, 949 A.2d 619, 680 (2008), in which this Court held that guilty verdicts cannot be legally inconsistent with not-guilty verdicts in the case of a trial by jury.

*437In Price, although this Court determined that legal inconsistency in verdicts is not permissible, this Court was not confronted with other questions concerning inconsistent verdicts, such as whether a…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Dietz v. BouldinSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. Webster v. FallSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. ChyungSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
  2. State v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
  3. Jarvis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2024
  4. State v. SaylesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  5. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API