Legal Opinion

Chung Kee v. Davidson

California Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1894No. 18228PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Calaveras County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court upon the first appeal, reported in 73 Cal., page 522, and in the opinion rendered upon this appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Haynes, C.

This is a second appeal. The opinion of the court upon the first appeal is reported in 73 Cal. at page 522.

The complaint contained a cause of action upon each of three claims assigned to plaintiffs, and three counts *190upon each cause of action. The first trial was confined to the first count upon each cause of action, and involved the liability of defendants to them upon the contract hereinafter referred to. Upon the second trial no evidence was given by the plaintiffs under the first count, but they based their right to recover upon the second and third counts of each cause of action.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. National Bank v. Grand LodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Sharon v. SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Donkersley v. LevyMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Lewis v. CovillaudCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  5. McLaren v. HutchinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Hargis v. Maryland Casualty Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1946
  2. Petersen v. LydersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Sturm v. UlrichCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  4. Treat v. MurdockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Marshall v. SwaimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API