Legal Opinion

State v. Katzman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1903No. 20,171PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From Tippecanoe Circuit Court; R. P. DeHart, Judge. Information against George Katzman for malicious mayhem. From a judgment entered on defendant’s plea • in abatement after overruling a demurrer thereto, the State appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtDowling, J.

— An information was filed in the Tippecanoe Circuit Court by the prosecuting attorney of that county, charging the appellee with the crime of malicious mayhem. The appellee filed a plea in abatement of the information on the ground that the grand jury of the county had previously investigated the occurrence, and had .returned an indictment against the appellee for simple mayhem, which was still pending in said court, etc. A demurrer to the plea was filed by the prosecuting attorney, and the objection thereto was stated to be that “the facts stated are not sufficient to constitute a plea in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hobbs v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Nichols v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Pine Civil Township v. Huber Manufacturing Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Lankford v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Grubbs v. KingIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Grand Lodge of the Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. ClarkIndiana Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Conrad v. HansenIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Oglebay v. Tippecanoe Loan & Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1907
  4. Minnich v. PackardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908
  5. State v. TamIndiana Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API