Legal Opinion

Grubbs v. King

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1889No. 13,464PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From the Adams Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Coffey, J. —

This was an action in the court below by the appellee against the appellants for an injunction.

The complaint alleges, substantially, that, on the 18th day of January, 1886, Catherine E. Albers and Peter R. Albers, *244constituting the firm of C. E. Albers & Son, as such firm, made, executed and delivered to appellee a deed of assignment, said assignment being voluntary, for the benefit of their creditors; that appellee, on said day, caused said deed to be duly recorded in the record of deeds in the recorder’s office of Adams county, Indiana, and that he was duly qualified as such…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Tenbrook v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  2. Pine Civil Township v. Huber Manufacturing Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Cincinnati & Chicago Railroad v. WashburnIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  4. Thomas v. GoodwineIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Gordon v. SwiftIndiana Supreme Court · 1872

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Conrad v. HansenIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Keltner v. PattonIndiana Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Hawley v. ZigerlyIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Peden v. MailIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Carnahan v. SchwabIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API