Legal Opinion
Kepler v. Schmalbach (In re Lemanski)
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Decided February 6, 1986No. Adv. Nos. 85-0063-7 to 85-0065-7PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
ROBERT D. MARTIN, Bankruptcy Judge.
These consolidated adversary proceedings arise out of related pre-petition transfers of the debtors, James and Martha Le-manski. The trustee, Michael Kepler has sought to avoid the transfers pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 547 and 548, to recover the same pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 550, and to preserve the voided transfers for the benefit of estate pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 551.1
In 1980, while experiencing financial difficulties on their farm, the debtors obtained loans from their parents (“the parents”), to wit: $20,000.00 from defendants Clarence…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Security Industrial BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Wright v. Vinton Branch of Mountain Trust Bank of RoanokeSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Wright v. Union Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Richard J. BRIDEN, Appellant, v. Anne FOLEY, Trustee in Bankruptcy, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re Corrline International, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2014
- In re Acis Capital Mgmt., L.P.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2018
- Mussetter v. LykeDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
- Matter of LemanskiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1986
- Barnhill v. Vaudreuil (In Re Busconi)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995