Legal Opinion
Hollywood Chamber of Commerce v. Railroad Commission
California Supreme Court
Decided October 29, 1923No. L. A. No. 7509PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.
The petitioner seeks a writ of mandate to compel the Railroad Commission of the state of California to assume jurisdiction of and to hear and determine a complaint which the petitioner filed with said Commission. In this complaint the petitioner asked the Commission to order the Los Angeles Railway Corporation to extend certain of its street-ear lines in the city of Los Angeles into the territory constituting a part of the city and known as Hollywood. After hearing argument on the question the Commission although of the opinion that it had power to make the order prayed for, dismissed the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pacific Telephone Etc. Co. v. EshlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railroad v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. Minnesota Ex Rel. State Railroad & Warehouse CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. v. R.R. Comm'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Oregon-Washington Railroad & NavigationSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Huron Portland Cement Co. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
- California Water & Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.