Harry v. Pratt
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
The plaintiffs, Harry and wife, seek recovery of damages for personal injuries suffered by Mrs. Harry claimed as the result of the negligent driv ing by tbe defendants, Pratt and Ely, of their respective automobiles along a paved public highway, causing their automobiles to come into collision and Pratt’s automobile to be thrown off the pavement striking Mrs. Harry who was then walking along the side of the highway off the pavement.
The cause proceeded to trial in the superior court for Pierce county sitting with a jury, the issues being as to the negligence of Pratt and Ely, or one or the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Barach v. Island Empire Telephone & Telegraph Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1929
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ritter v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1931
- Hauswirth v. Pom-ArleauWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Bergstrom v. OveWashington Supreme Court · 1951
- Copeland v. North Coast Transportation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932
- Arnold v. OwensCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.