Legal Opinion

Augsburger v. Homestead Mutual Insurance

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided August 28, 2013No. 2012AP641PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGundrum, J.

¶ 1. Under Wis. Stat. § 174.02 (2011-12),1 an "owner" of a dog is subject to strict liability for injuries caused by the dog. An "owner" is *489"any person who owns, harbors or keeps a dog." Wis. Stat. § 174.001(5). George Kontos permitted his adult daughter, her family, and their dogs to reside in a home he owned but in which he himself did not reside. Julie Augsburger alleges the dogs attacked and injured her when she visited Kontos's daughter at that home. In this case, we are asked to decide if, under these circumstances, Kontos was a harborer of the dogs, and therefore a statutory owner of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In RE MARRIAGE OF COOK v. CookWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Colla v. MandellaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Fandrey v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Pawlowski v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Becker v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Julie A. Augsburger v. Homestead Mutual Insurance CompanyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Julie A. Augsburger v. Homestead Mutual Insurance CompanyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Julie A. Augsburger v. Homestead Mutual Insurance CompanyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API