Legal Opinion

Geschwind v. Flanagan

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 20, 1992No. 26377-3-IPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.

Timothy J. Geschwind, Sr., appeals from a judgment on a verdict denying him recovery for injuries sustained in an automobile accident. He contends the tort reform act should not have applied to this case, and that the trial court erred in: (1) submitting the issue of his contributory negligence to the jury; (2) refusing to rule as a matter of law that he could not be found more than 50 percent at fault; and (3) refusing to instruct the jury that certain material exhibited during respondent's closing argument was not in evidence.

Respondent Jane Seymour, as personal representative of the estate…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Smith v. ShannonWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Rinke v. Johns-Manville Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1987

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Geschwind v. FlanaganWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Young v. Estate of SnellWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Wagg v. Estate of DunhamCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  4. Wagg v. Estate of DunhamCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  5. Augustson v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API