Eberly v. A-P Controls, Inc.

Appellant, A-P, presents three propositions for the court’s consideration. The first attacks the verdict entered by the appellate court *30based upon the interrogatories returned by the jury. The second attacks the jury verdict as against the manifest weight of the evidence. The last attacks the trial court’s ruling on the admissibility of hearsay statements of Warfel offered by A-P. We will address the second and third propositions initially, and close with the first proposition.

I

A-P contends that the verdict was not supported by the evidence and, thus, the trial court erred when it denied…