State v. Cotton

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

The defendant was convicted of grand larceny for the theft of a steer.

He appeals, first directing our attention to his seventh specification of error which is predicated on want of sufficient evidence to *2sustain the verdict of the jury. The state’s evidence included that of eye witnesses who saw defendant hauling a steer in a truck, which steer was afterwards identified as the property of Seglem and Hamilton from whom it had been stolen. The state’s evidence also tended to show that the stolen steer was sold by defendant to one Steams, and…