Legal Opinion
Cusick v. Feldpausch
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 23, 1932No. Docket No. 64, Calendar No. 36,141PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.
On February 3, 1929, Leo Feldpausch, Jr., drove an automobile of the other defendants, copartners as Feldpausch Brothers. He drove with their permission but not for them. He had with him the plaintiff, gratuitous guest. The automobile skidded on ice, and turned over, and plaintiff was injured. She had verdict and judgment. Defendants have appealed.
Liability is asserted against the partners under section 29, Act No. 302, Pnb. Acts 1915 (amended by Act No. 56, Pub. Acts 1927). This section was amended by Act No. 19, Pub. Acts 1929 (1 Comp. Laws 1929, §4648). The old section 29, providing of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Naudzius v. LahrMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Ettor v. City of TacomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Lewis v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- Menges v. DentlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1859
- Roy v. KirnMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- In Re Certified QuestionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- City of Detroit v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
- Karl v. Bryant Air Conditioning Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
- General Motors Corp. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
- Minty v. Board of State AuditorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.