Legal Opinion
Heidie Tuxedos & Formals, Inc. v. New York State Division of Human Rights
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 2, 1996PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
—Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: The determination of respondent New York State Division of Human Rights that petitioner committed an unlawful discriminatory practice by terminating complainant from employment because of her gender and gender-specific disability (pregnancy) is supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Consolidated Edison Co. v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 77 NY2d 411, 417, rearg denied 78 NY2d 909; 300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 179-180). The award of $10,000 as…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. TychanskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. New York State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- New York State Department of Correctional Services v. State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- City of Fulton v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Diaz Chemical Corp. v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997