Diaz Chemical Corp. v. New York State Division of Human Rights
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Determination modified on the law and as modified confirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Petitioner has failed to demonstrate that it suffered substantial actual prejudice by reason of the 14-year delay of respondent New York State Division of Human Rights (SDHR) in reaching a final determination and thus petitioner is not entitled to dismissal of the petition (see, Matter of Corning Glass Works v Ovsanik, 84 NY2d 619, 624). Nevertheless, we do not condone SDHR’s extraordinary delay in *933resolving complaints (see, Matter of Alverson v State Div. of Human Rights,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- New York City Transit Authority v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- People v. TychanskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. New York State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Corning Glass Works v. OvsanikNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- New York State Department of Correctional Services v. State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Burton v. MattelianoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Bond v. Sterling, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 1998
- KT'S Junction, Inc. v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Iroquois Nursing Home, Inc. v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Harp v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.