Legal Opinion
United States v. Perez
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided September 2, 1994No. 92-2820PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Per curiam
The defendants appeal their convictions for conspiracy and possession with intent to distribute crack cocaine. The defendants argue that the district court erred in failing to declare a mistrial after a government witness gave unanticipated and unduly prejudicial testimony regarding an attempt to bribe him not to testify against the defendants. Individual defendants also raise other issues challenging their convictions. We affirm.
7. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On January 29, 1992, the Grand Jury indicted eleven individuals on one count of conspiracy and one count of possession with intent to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. SatterfieldCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Stephen G. Scholle, United States of America v. Michael S. NeedhamCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Eduardo Jaime RoucoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Ronald M. Funt, Randy Webman, Thomas John HarveyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Cesar Tenorio-AngelCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. Raul Trujillo, Francisco Nelson FuentesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Howard William Harriston, Iii, A.K.A. Little Bill, A.K.A. Little Geek, A.K.A. Young Gun, A.K.A. Melvin JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Harry W. Snyder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- United States v. PerezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Lozano-HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.