Legal Opinion

Walsh v. Paine

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 24, 1913No. Nos. 17,954—(30)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action in tbe district court for St. Louis county against Asa Paine and A. M. Russell to recover various sums of money paid to tbem. The facts are stated in the opinion. The case was tried before Dibell, J., who denied separate motions for a directed verdict in favor of each defendant and a jury which returned a verdict of $6,-871.93 against both defendants.

Read the full summary

Action in tbe district court for St. Louis county against Asa Paine and A. M. Russell to recover various sums of money paid to tbem. The facts are stated in the opinion. The case was tried before Dibell, J., who denied separate motions for a directed verdict in favor of each defendant and a jury which returned a verdict of $6,-871.93 against both defendants. Defendants’ motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict were denied and their motions for a new trial were granted. Prom the order granting a new trial, plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBunn, J.

This action was to recover damages for the fraud of defendants in inducing plaintiff to purchase defendant Paine’s interest in the Russell Motor Co. and to advance money to the company thereafter. There was a verdict for $6,871.93 against both defendants. Each defendant moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a *187¡new trial. The motions for judgment were denied, but a new trial .granted as to each defendant. Plaintiff appeals from these orders.

The new trial was granted because the trial court was of the •opinion that there was prejudicial error in its rulings on the admission of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brackett v. . GriswoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Reynolds v. FranklinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  3. Redding v. GodwinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  4. Vilett v. MolerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  5. Halbert v. PrankeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Leif M. Hanson v. Ford Motor Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
  2. Lack Industries, Inc. v. Ralston Purina Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
  3. Sodergren v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  4. Lack Industries, Incorporated v. Ralston Purina CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API