Sodergren v. Nelson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Hennepin county against William E. Nelson, John A. Nelson and Hans A. Hanson to recover $1,918.14. The facts are stated in the opinion. The case was tried before Hale, J., and a jury which returned a verdict in favor of defendants. From an order denying his motion for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Dibell, C.
Action to. recover of the defendants by way of contribution on notes indorsed by the plaintiff and the defendants and paid by the plaintiff. *467There was a verdict for the defendants. Plaintiff appeals from the order denying his motion for a new trial.
1. The plaintiff and the defendants were interested in the Morton Brick & Tile Company. They were its officers and stockholders. The company made notes to the First State Bank of Morton. They were indorsed by the plaintiff and the defendants. The company did not pay them. They were protested and were paid by the plaintiff. The plaintiff…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Halbert v. PrankeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- Peterson v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Walsh v. PaineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Hibbs v. MarpeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
3Cited by1 opinion
- Waldron v. PageSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934