Legal Opinion
United States Steel Corporation v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 19, 1967No. 65 Civ. 3043PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LEVET, District Judge.
United States Steel Corporation, the above-entitled plaintiff, has moved under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for summary judgment with respect to the claim for depletion deductions set forth in paragraphs 16, 17 and 18 of its complaint and, likewise, for an order pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure determining that there is no just reason for delay and that an express direction for entry of final judgment thereon be made.
The defendant, United States of America, has counter-moved for summary judgment in its favor on the…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Helvering v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Palmer v. BenderSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- United States v. LudeySupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Anderson v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Commissioner v. LesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Coye Peterson v. The Oklahoma City Housing Authority, a Public Corporation and State AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
- Modular Concepts, Inc. v. So. Brunswick Twp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- University Plaza Shopping Center, Inc. v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Callahan Mining Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1969
- State Ex Rel. State Land Board v. Corvallis Sand & Gravel Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.