Hines v. Tripp
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtRodman, J.
Plaintiffs’ assignments of error are directed to rulings excluding evidence offered for the purpose of establishing the alleged contract.
Defendants’ denial of the alleged contract is equivalent to a plea of the statute of frauds, G.S. 22-2. Hunt v. Hunt, 261 N.C. 437, 135 S.E. 2d 195; Pickelsimer v. Pickelsimer, 257 N.C. 696, 127 S.E. 2d 557; McCraw v. Llewellyn, 256 N.C. 213, 123 S.E. 2d 575; Humphrey v. Faison, 247 N.C. 127, 100 S.E. 2d 524; Jamerson v. Logan, 228 N.C. 540, 46 S.E. 2d 561.
To bind defendants, plaintiffs had the burden of showing a written contract, “or some memorandum or…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Lane v. CoeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Lewis v. . MurraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Hall v. Misenheimer.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Jamerson v. . LoganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- McCraw v. LlewellynSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Mezzanotte v. FreelandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
- Chaisson v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Yaggy v. BVD COMPANYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- Currituck Associates—Residential Partnership v. HollowellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- Schafer v. Barrier Island Station, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.