State ex rel. Polk v. Hancock
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMPSON, Judge.
¶ 1 This case comes before us as a standoff between the Yavapai County Attorney’s Office (the County Attorney) and the Yavapai County Superior Court. The County Attorney recently adopted a policy that all plea agreements would include the following provision (“marijuana provision”): “Defendant shall not buy, grow, possess, consume, or use marijuana in any form, whether or not Defendant has a medical marijuana card issued by the State of Arizona pursuant to AR.S. § 36-2801, et seq.”1 After accepting a plea *303in the above matter, the trial judge struck the marijuana…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Nixon v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- State v. MorseArizona Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. StottsArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- State Ex Rel. Woods v. BlockArizona Supreme Court · 1997
- J.W. Hancock Enterprises, Inc. v. Arizona State Registrar of ContractorsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. Hon. hancock/jennifer FerrellArizona Supreme Court · 2015
- Keenan Reed-Kaliher v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Keenan Reed-Kaliher v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Keenan Reed-Kaliher v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014