Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Polk v. Hancock

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 18, 2014No. 1 CA-SA 13-0292PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THOMPSON, Judge.

¶ 1 This case comes before us as a standoff between the Yavapai County Attorney’s Office (the County Attorney) and the Yavapai County Superior Court. The County Attorney recently adopted a policy that all plea agreements would include the following provision (“marijuana provision”): “Defendant shall not buy, grow, possess, consume, or use marijuana in any form, whether or not Defendant has a medical marijuana card issued by the State of Arizona pursuant to AR.S. § 36-2801, et seq.”1 After accepting a plea *303in the above matter, the trial judge struck the marijuana…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Nixon v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. State v. MorseArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. StottsArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State Ex Rel. Woods v. BlockArizona Supreme Court · 1997
  5. J.W. Hancock Enterprises, Inc. v. Arizona State Registrar of ContractorsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. Hon. hancock/jennifer FerrellArizona Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Keenan Reed-Kaliher v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  3. Keenan Reed-Kaliher v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  4. Keenan Reed-Kaliher v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API