Legal Opinion · Dissent

Keenan Reed-Kaliher v. State of Arizona

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 25, 2014No. 2 CA-SA 2014-0015Published

1DissentEspinosa, Judge

¶ 33 I respectfully disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the respondent judge erred in prohibiting Reed-Kaliher, a convicted narcotics trafficker and drug abuser, from possessing and using marijuana as a term of his probation, even in the face of the AMMA And, on the latter point, because Reed-Kali-her stipulated to his probation, which included terms necessarily prohibiting marijuana use, there is no need to address, on these facts, either the question of whether the AMMA prevents a court from imposing a bar on medical marijuana use as a condition of probation, or the issue of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Estate of Hernandez v. Bd. of RegentsArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. CamargoArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State v. Marquez-SosaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  4. State v. LynchCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  5. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API