Keenan Reed-Kaliher v. State of Arizona
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1DissentEspinosa, Judge
¶ 33 I respectfully disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the respondent judge erred in prohibiting Reed-Kaliher, a convicted narcotics trafficker and drug abuser, from possessing and using marijuana as a term of his probation, even in the face of the AMMA And, on the latter point, because Reed-Kali-her stipulated to his probation, which included terms necessarily prohibiting marijuana use, there is no need to address, on these facts, either the question of whether the AMMA prevents a court from imposing a bar on medical marijuana use as a condition of probation, or the issue of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Estate of Hernandez v. Bd. of RegentsArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. CamargoArizona Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. Marquez-SosaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
- State v. LynchCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.