Smith v. Pernoll
Court of Appeals of Oregon
RICHARDSON, J.
1Opinion of the Court
*397RICHARDSON, J.
This is a civil suit alleging malpractice against defendant doctors, who are employes of the State of Oregon. The issue is whether the plaintiff must present notice of the tort claim within 180 days of its occurrence under ORS 30.2751 when the state employes are sued individually but the state is not joined as a defendant.
Plaintiff’s cause of action arises out of allegedly negligent surgery performed by defendants. Plaintiff’s first complaint alleged the defendants were agents of the state. Defendants’ demurrer to the complaint, on the ground it failed to plead that a notice was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fifth Avenue Corp. v. WASHINGTON COUNTY, ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
- James v. Carnation Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Urban Renewal Agency v. LackeyOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Pacific Power & Light Co. v. State Tax CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- Fry v. Willamalane Park & Recreation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bradford v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Smith v. PernollOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Brown v. Portland School District No. 1Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- Bradford v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- Hughes v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.