Legal Opinion
Jurin v. Google Inc.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided March 1, 2010No. 2:09-cv-3065PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., District Judge.
Through this action Plaintiff Daniel Jurin (“Plaintiff’) alleges several violations of state and federal law arising out of the use of the trademarked name “Styrotrim” as a suggested keyword in the “AdWords” program operated by Defendant Google, Inc. (“Defendant”). Presently before the Court is a Motion by Defendant to Dismiss the Second, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, and Ninth Causes of Action alleged by Plaintiff for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).
Defendant…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Charles H. CAHILL; Aniko Der Cahill, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- John Desoto v. Yellow Freight Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Google, Incorporated v. James Hood, IIICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- Fraley v. Facebook, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2011
- M.A. ex rel P.K. v. Village Voice Media Holdings, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2011
- Hill v. StubHub, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- Free Kick Master LLC v. Apple Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.